The Pavia DEmA (Diachronic Emergence of Alignment) Database

Home › Languages › Romanian

Romanian

Glottocode: roma1327

Genalogical classification: Indo-European

Original alignment pattern: Nominative

Source construction: Transitive clause with a topicalized animate P argument: 'As for X, Y VERBed X', as in (1).

Developmental mechanism: The topic marker is reintepreted as a marker of the P argument.

Resulting construction: Transitive constructions with an overtly marked P argument, as in (2), (pe is the modern form of pre).

Type of change: Grammaticalization

Alignment in the resulting construction: Nominative-Accusative

Global alignment pattern following the change: Differential object marking

Constraints on the distribution of the resulting alignment: Accusative marking is restricted to pronouns and animate nouns.

Grammatical domains: Case marking

Symmetry: Asymmetric

Type of data: Historical data

References: Rohlfs 1984, Pensado 1995, Mardale 2010:4-6, Hill & Mardale 2019

Comments:
The Romanian topic marker historically derives from the Latin spatial prepositions per 'through, by' or super 'on top, concerning'. This type of development underlies the rise of differential object marking in several Romance languages (in other languages the preposition recruited for DOM is the continuant of Latin ad 'to').

Examples

(1) Romanian (Indo-European; Hill & Mardale 2019:14)

pre aces̩ti boiari i-au băgat în temnit̩ă
TOP these lords them.ACC=have.3PL thrown in jail

'These lords, they throw them in jail.'

(2) Romanian (Indo-European; Pensado 1995:219)

Pe mine nu m-a văzut
ACC 1SG.OBJ NEG 1SG-AUX see.PTCPL

‘He didn’t see me.’

Credits: apnetwork