The Pavia DEmA (Diachronic Emergence of Alignment) Database

Home › Languages › English

English

Glottocode: stan1293

Genalogical classification: Indo-European

Original alignment pattern: Nominative

Source construction: In Old English, some noun classes still retained a distinction between nominative case for A and S and accusative case for P in the singular, as in (1).

Developmental mechanism: Two phonological changes took place: (i) unstressed vowels were reduced to schwa, (ii) word final -n got lost. These changes eliminated the distinction between A and S forms on the one hand and P forms on the other.

Resulting construction: Case marking on nouns was lost, bringing about a new neuter alignment pattern for case marking.

Type of change: Phonological change

Alignment in the resulting construction: Neuter

Global alignment pattern following the change: NP-based split accusativity

Constraints on the distribution of the resulting alignment: The new alignement pattern is restricted to nouns, whereas non-neuter pronouns still retain a nominative-accusative alignment pattern (e.g. he/him, she/her).

Grammatical domains: Case marking

Symmetry: Symmetric

Type of data: Historical data

References: Blake 2001:176-178

Examples

(1) English (Indo-European; Blake 2001:177)

Noun A, S P Noun A, S P
'tale' talu tale 'name' nama naman

Credits: apnetwork